Skip to main content

Aldo Rossi’s Città Analoga: Legend of a legend

Datum
Uhrzeit
Organisationseinheiten
Akademie
Ortsbeschreibung
Vortragsaal IKA R211a, 2.OG
Ort, Treffpunkt (1)
Hauptgebäude
Ort, Adresse (1)
Schillerplatz 3
Ort, PLZ und/oder Ort (1)
1010 Wien

Vortrag von Jean-Pierre Chupin, Architect, Professor and Chair of Laboratoire d'étude de l'architecture potentielle (L.E.A.P), Université de Montréal, im Rahmen der Vortragsreihe "We built this city" am Institut für Kunst und Architektur im Sommersemester 2009.

A curious character haunts certain of Aldo Rossi’s drawings: a sketched figure, dark or clothed in black.  He stands before a window against the sunlight, in a bare room dimly lit by a lamp suspended from the ceiling.  In the foreground, a bottle of wine and a piece of fruit sit on a table.  There is an ambiguity to his gaze: does he look through the window to the world beyond, or does he stare at the frame of the window itself?

This obscure character figures prominently in the composition entitled Città Analoga, first presented at the 1976 Venice Biennale.  The image, and by extension, the idea of the Analogical City that it embodies, is central to an ongoing reflection taken up by Rossi at the end of the 60s, recurring throughout the 70s, and brutally interrupted in the early 80s.  By focusing on an examination of the Città Analoga, this lecture hopes to contribute to a historical and theoretical sitting of Rossi’s theory of the analogical imagination of the city.

Jean-Pierre Chupin is an architecture graduate from Nantes (France), and Portsmouth (UK). He has a Masters in History and Theory of Architecture from McGill University and a PhD from the Université de Montréal. He taught at the Université du Québec in Montreal, Toulouse School of Architecture and Lyon School of Architecture before joining the Université de Montréal. He is the co-founder and scientific director of the Laboratoire d’Étude de l’Architecture Potentielle ( www.leap.umontreal.ca ), and heads up the design and updating work on the Canadian Competitions Catalogue ( www.ccc.umontreal.ca ) and the European Competitions Database ( www.arclab.umontreal.ca/EUROPAN-FR ).
More generally, his research work focuses on knowledge by analogy in architecture (history, theory, practice and teaching) and on tectonics. Alongside Cyrille Simonnet and Kenneth Frampton, he has published Le projet tectonique (InFolio, Golion, 2005). He is currently completing a work on the analogy spectrum in architecture which will appear under the title Analogies, matière d’architecture, in the collection Projet et Théorie which he is co-directing with Paolo Amaldi (InFolio, 2009).

Weitere Vorträge der Reihe
Further lectures in this series

27.04.2009 | 19:00h | R211a
Jeremy Foster
Assistant Professor of Landscape Architecture, Cornell University
Urban entropy and socio-natural temporalities in post-apartheid Johannesburg

18.05.2009 | 19:00h | R211a
ppag architects
Architects, Vienna
WE BUILD THIS CITY… YES, IT'S US (ALL) !

08.06.2009 | 19:00h | R211a
Valéry Didelon
Architecture Theorist, Paris

About the Lecture Series:

WE BUILT THIS CITY…

Architects build Cities, how?
Can we reduce the city as simply a collection of buildings, or do we need to distinguish between architecture and urbanism?
How can we ignore one if we are conceiving the other?
Isthe city a system of buildings or is it a complex system, which allowsfor buildings to be arranged in an orderly or chaotic manner?
Some cities are more desirable to live in than others, why?
Some cities are more expensive t han others, why? | Some cities are easier to get around, why?
Some cities are models for others, why?
Some cities are greener than others, why?
Some cities are dormitories, why?
Some cities are struggling with their glorious past, why?
Some cities are grounds for experiments, why?
Some cities are divided by war, why?
Some cities are automobile cities, why?
Some cities are exploited by politics, why?
Some cities are more public than others, why?
Some cities are…

Thelecture series 08/09 will explore the question of urbanity, and whatmakes the city of the 21st century a ground for another urbanism: Wewill debate the future possibilities of the metropolis. If Manhattanwas the model of a retroactive manifesto, what could be the future ofour urban living? And who is to build it?