What is artistic labour? This seminar addresses the question by examining the relationship between art and labour, offering students conceptual and critical tools to analyse how labour is disclosed, performed, and embodied in art. Through close readings of key theoretical texts and detailed studies of selected artistic practices from the 1970s to the present, the course examines art not only as a representation of work but as a form of labour in itself. Traditionally, work in art history has been treated as subject matter rather than as constitutive of artistic practice. The artist was imagined as autonomous and positioned outside the division of labour and capitalist valorisation - a figure of creative genius rather than a worker. From the 1970s onward, however, the dichotomy between art and labour, and between artist and worker, began to break down due to a paradigm shift in production and valorisation, mainly in Western industrialised countries. The industrial sector (once the model of production, now primarily outsourced to the Global South) gave way to the service sector and new ways of working. Labour increasingly took on performative, communicative, and creative dimensions. Qualities such as flexibility, autonomy, and creativity became central to capitalist production. The artist, as a creative subject, appeared as the avant-garde of a new class of precarious workers. “Be creative!” became the imperative of the post-Fordist era - a creativity aimed not at freedom but at surplus accumulation. Within this new convergence of art and labour, artists responded by identifying themselves as workers, forming alliances modelled on trade unions and critically examining their own conditions of production. Art was reclaimed as a heteronomous activity shaped by economic, political, social, gendered, and racial conditions, just as work in general is. If the post-Fordist era can still be said to be ongoing, its discursive centrality has nevertheless shifted. The indeterminacy of the creative subject no longer seems as functional to capitalist valorisation as it was in the early 2000s and 2010s. Today, there is a stronger sense of automation and systemic overdetermination driven by AI, platforms, and social media, alongside the increasing fragmentation of labour and subjectivities. How does this reshape the forms of labour that art embodies?The course consists of 7 three-hour sessions. After an introductory meeting, 6 sessions are organised into 3 thematic blocks. The first examines the historical shift from the art–labour dichotomy to their overlap in the transition from industrial to service societies, analysing artistic practices that critically reflect on their own production processes and social entanglements. The second block addresses artistic practice and reproductive labour from a feminist perspective, including debates on domestic and care work, affective labour, Autonomist Marxist feminism, critical race critiques, and contemporary theories of reproduction. The final block focuses on artificial intelligence and automation, exploring how digital technologies and platform economies transform work and artistic production today.
Title Not just another Job. The Artist at Work.
Description What is artistic labour? This seminar addresses the question by examining the relationship between art and labour, offering students conceptual and critical tools to analyse how labour is disclosed, performed, and embodied in art. Through close readings of key theoretical texts and detailed studies of selected artistic practices from the 1970s to the present, the course examines art not only as a representation of work but as a form of labour in itself. Traditionally, work in art history has been treated as subject matter rather than as constitutive of artistic practice. The artist was imagined as autonomous and positioned outside the division of labour and capitalist valorisation - a figure of creative genius rather than a worker. From the 1970s onward, however, the dichotomy between art and labour, and between artist and worker, began to break down due to a paradigm shift in production and valorisation, mainly in Western industrialised countries. The industrial sector (once the model of production, now primarily outsourced to the Global South) gave way to the service sector and new ways of working. Labour increasingly took on performative, communicative, and creative dimensions. Qualities such as flexibility, autonomy, and creativity became central to capitalist production. The artist, as a creative subject, appeared as the avant-garde of a new class of precarious workers. “Be creative!” became the imperative of the post-Fordist era - a creativity aimed not at freedom but at surplus accumulation. Within this new convergence of art and labour, artists responded by identifying themselves as workers, forming alliances modelled on trade unions and critically examining their own conditions of production. Art was reclaimed as a heteronomous activity shaped by economic, political, social, gendered, and racial conditions, just as work in general is. If the post-Fordist era can still be said to be ongoing, its discursive centrality has nevertheless shifted. The indeterminacy of the creative subject no longer seems as functional to capitalist valorisation as it was in the early 2000s and 2010s. Today, there is a stronger sense of automation and systemic overdetermination driven by AI, platforms, and social media, alongside the increasing fragmentation of labour and subjectivities. How does this reshape the forms of labour that art embodies?The course consists of 7 three-hour sessions. After an introductory meeting, 6 sessions are organised into 3 thematic blocks. The first examines the historical shift from the art–labour dichotomy to their overlap in the transition from industrial to service societies, analysing artistic practices that critically reflect on their own production processes and social entanglements. The second block addresses artistic practice and reproductive labour from a feminist perspective, including debates on domestic and care work, affective labour, Autonomist Marxist feminism, critical race critiques, and contemporary theories of reproduction. The final block focuses on artificial intelligence and automation, exploring how digital technologies and platform economies transform work and artistic production today.
Learning Objective - students will gain cognitive and affective competencies necessary to explore the relationship between art and labour, and to analyse the performative disclosure of labour in art- knowledge and understanding of key terms such as productive, reproductive, and artistic labour; maintenance and domestic work; immaterial labour, etc. - an understanding of the complex intersection between art and reproduction in the context of feminist artistic practices- furthering students’ critical and reflexive practice on the relation to labour within their own artistic, curatorial, critical, or teaching practice
Form of Assessment GRADING SCHEME 2 ECTS 20% of the final grade is based on attendance and active participation in class discussions, activities, and presentations. The remaining 80% is based on the quality and consistency of students’ presentations on a topic discussed in class or agreed upon with the teacher. To receive a grade, students must attend at least 75% of classes, meaning they may miss a maximum of 2 sessions.GRADING SCHEME 5 ECTS20% of the final grade is based on attendance and active participation in class discussions, activities, and presentations. The remaining 80% is based on the quality and consistency of students’ presentations on a topic discussed in class or agreed upon with the teacher, as well as a written paper that researches and reflects on aspects that emerged during the course, to be submitted at the end of the seminar. To receive a grade, students must attend at least 75% of classes, meaning they may miss a maximum of 2 sessions.
Recommended Prerequisites No previous knowledge is required. However, students are expected to read and engage with complex texts from different fields
Admission Info URL https://campus.akbild.ac.at/akbild_online/ee/ui/ca2/app/desktop/#/slc.tm.cp/student/courses/177857?$ctx=design=ca;lang=de&$scrollTo=toc_appointments
Syllabus URL Preliminary bibliography:Silvia Federici, “Wages against housework” (1975), in: “Revolution at point zero: housework, reproduction, and feminist struggle”, New York: Common Notions, 2012Andrea Fraser, "How to provide an Artistic Service: An introduction."1994, in: "Museum Highlights: The Writing of Andrea Fraser", ed. Alexander Alberro, MIT Press, 2005, pp. 153-161Isabel Graw, "When Life Goes to Work: Andy Warhol", October no. 132 (Spring 2010)Maurizio Lazzarato, “Immaterial Labour”, in: Michael Hardt, Paolo Virno, Eds., “RadicalThought In Italy: A Potential Politics”, Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, pp.133-147Lucy R. Lippard, "The Art Workers' Coalition: Not a History", Studio International (November 1970)Karl Marx, “The Dual Character of the Labour embodied in Commodities”, in: “Capital: ACritique of Political Economy, Volume 1”, London: Penguin, 1990, pp.131-138Katja Praznik, “Art Work. Invisible Labour and the Legacy of Yugoslav Socialism”, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2021Hito Steyerl, "Is a Museum a Factory?", e-flux journal no.7, June-August 2009Paolo Virno, "A Grammar of the Multitude: For an Analysis of Contemporary Forms of Life", 2004, Los Angeles and New York: Semiotext(e) Marina Vishmidt, “What do we mean by ‘Autonomy’ and ‘Reproduction’?”, in: KerstinStakemeier, Marina Vishmidt, “Reproducing Autonomy. Work, Money, Crisis & Contemporary Art”, London, Berlin: Mute Publishing, 2016, pp. 34-53Marina Vishmidt, “The Two Reproductions in (Feminist) Art and Theory since the 1970s”,London: Third Text, Volume 31, Issue 1, 2017, pp. 49-66Mierle Laderman Ukeles, “Maintenance Art Manifesto, Proposal for an Exhibition, ‘CARE’,”[1969] in Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology, eds. Alexander Alberro and Blake Stimson,Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009